On the Fragility of Self-Improving Agents: Variance, Task Order, and Underspecification
This study systematically evaluates the fragility of memory-based self-improving agents, revealing high variance and task order sensitivity, and proposes information enrichment to mitigate performance degradation.
Key Findings
Methodology
The research employs multiple runs and random task shuffling to assess two representative memory-augmented methods, Agent Workflow Memory (AWM) and ReasoningBank (RBank), across three benchmarks: WebArena, VisualWebArena, and SCUBA. By collecting run-level statistics—mean success rate, standard deviation, and best-worst gap—the study quantifies performance variability. The experiments include evaluating the impact of task order by comparing default sequences with randomized orders. Manual analysis of memory contents identifies that underspecification of environment and task details leads to inconsistent and sometimes irrelevant memories. Incorporating explicit task rubrics and environment feedback during memory construction partially alleviates performance drops, highlighting the importance of detailed specifications for robustness.
Key Results
- Across 180 tasks in WebArena, the maximum success rate difference between runs reached 4.4%, with a standard deviation of 1.98%. When self-improvement methods like RBank were applied, the variance increased, with the maximum gap reaching 7.8%. These results demonstrate that single-run evaluations can be misleading due to high variability.
- Task order significantly influences performance: the default order, which implicitly follows an easy-to-hard curriculum, yields an average gain of 1.5%, whereas random shuffling causes a performance decline of 4.5%. This indicates high sensitivity to task sequence, challenging the assumption of stable performance in real-world scenarios.
- Manual inspection of memory contents revealed that missing environment constraints (e.g., API support) and ambiguous task descriptions lead to the generation of irrelevant or unexecutable memories. For example, suggesting API calls in a browser-only environment or misinterpreting user queries causes errors. Enhancing memory construction with detailed rubrics and environment feedback reduces these issues by approximately 31%, but performance gaps persist, indicating other uncharacterized factors at play.
Significance
This work exposes critical vulnerabilities in current self-improving agents, emphasizing the necessity of rigorous evaluation protocols that include multiple runs and task order variations. The findings underscore that without explicit environment and task specifications, models are prone to unpredictable failures, limiting their deployment in safety-critical applications. By identifying underspecification as a key driver of fragility, the study guides future research toward designing systems with better human oversight and explicit context integration. These insights are vital for advancing autonomous AI systems that are both effective and reliable in dynamic, real-world environments, especially in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, finance, and autonomous driving.
Technical Contribution
This research introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework combining multiple runs and task shuffling to quantify model stability. It highlights the impact of underspecification on memory quality, demonstrating that missing or ambiguous environment/task details lead to inconsistent behaviors. The study proposes incorporating explicit task rubrics and environment feedback during memory construction, which improves robustness by approximately 31%. Additionally, it provides detailed manual analysis of memory content, establishing a new standard for diagnosing and mitigating fragility in self-improving systems. These contributions advance the understanding of stability issues in memory-based AI and set the stage for developing more reliable autonomous agents.
Novelty
This is the first systematic study to combine multiple experimental repetitions with task order randomization to evaluate the stability of memory-augmented self-improving agents. It uniquely identifies underspecification of environment and task information as a core cause of performance variability. Unlike prior works that focus solely on performance metrics, this research emphasizes robustness and reliability, proposing practical strategies like information enrichment to address identified weaknesses. Its comprehensive approach and manual memory analysis provide new insights into the fragility mechanisms of self-improving AI systems, marking a significant step forward in the field.
Limitations
- The evaluation is primarily limited to web browsing and enterprise automation tasks, which may not generalize directly to other complex domains such as multi-modal or multi-task learning scenarios.
- Adding detailed task and environment information increases computational overhead and system complexity, potentially hindering deployment in resource-constrained settings.
- Despite improvements, significant performance variability remains under extreme task order shifts and environment changes, indicating that further robustness enhancements are necessary.
- The current analysis relies heavily on manual inspection, which may not be scalable; automated diagnostics and broader datasets are needed for comprehensive validation.
Future Work
Future research should explore more sophisticated methods for automatic detection and correction of underspecification, such as dynamic environment modeling and adaptive memory updates. Extending evaluation protocols to include diverse task domains and real-world scenarios will enhance generalizability. Developing standardized benchmarks for robustness and stability, along with human-in-the-loop oversight interfaces, can improve safety and trustworthiness. Additionally, integrating explainability techniques will help diagnose failure modes and facilitate debugging, ultimately leading to autonomous agents that are both highly capable and reliably safe in complex, unpredictable environments.
AI Executive Summary
The rapid advancement of self-improving agents, powered by large language models and memory mechanisms, promises transformative impacts across industries. These systems, capable of learning from ongoing experiences, have demonstrated impressive performance in tasks like web browsing and enterprise automation. However, their deployment in real-world settings raises critical questions about reliability and robustness. Traditional evaluation practices, often limited to single runs and fixed task sequences, fail to capture the inherent variability and fragility of such models.
This study systematically addresses these concerns by employing multiple experimental repetitions and random task shuffling across three benchmark datasets: WebArena, VisualWebArena, and SCUBA. The results reveal that performance variance is substantial, with success rate differences reaching up to 4.4% in single runs and even higher variability when models are subjected to different task orders. Notably, the application of self-improvement mechanisms like ReasoningBank tends to amplify this variance, exposing the fragile nature of current approaches.
A key insight from manual analysis of model-generated memories shows that many errors stem from underspecification—missing or ambiguous environment and task details. For example, models often suggest API calls in environments where such actions are unsupported or misinterpret vague task descriptions, leading to irrelevant or unexecutable memories. To mitigate these issues, the authors incorporate explicit task rubrics and environment feedback during memory construction, which improves robustness by roughly 31%. Despite these improvements, significant performance gaps remain, especially under randomized task sequences.
The findings underscore the importance of rigorous evaluation protocols that include multiple runs and task order variations, especially for high-stakes applications. They also highlight the necessity of designing systems with better human oversight and explicit context integration to prevent unpredictable failures. Moving forward, research should focus on automating underspecification detection, expanding to diverse task domains, and developing standardized benchmarks for robustness. Ultimately, this work paves the way for more reliable, safe, and trustworthy autonomous AI systems capable of operating effectively in dynamic environments, fulfilling their promise of intelligent self-improvement while maintaining safety and stability.
Deep Analysis
Background
自我提升智能体在人工智能领域经历了快速发展，从早期的规则驱动系统到近年来基于大规模语言模型（如GPT-3、GPT-4）和记忆机制的系统。这些系统通过维护文本记忆库，实现持续学习和任务优化，已在网页浏览、自动化办公和企业管理等场景中展现出潜力。代表性方法包括Agent Workflow Memory（AWM）和ReasoningBank（RBank），它们通过存储成功或失败的任务轨迹，增强模型的推理能力和适应性。然而，尽管取得了一定的性能提升，现有研究多集中在单次性能指标，缺乏对模型在多次运行和任务顺序变化中的稳定性分析。随着任务复杂度的增加，模型表现出明显的随机性和对任务顺序的敏感性，亟需引入多次实验和环境扰动的评估策略，以确保其在实际应用中的可靠性。
Core Problem
尽管基于记忆的自我提升方法在实验中表现出一定优势，但在复杂环境中表现出高变异性成为主要瓶颈。具体表现为：模型在多次运行中的成功率差异可达10个百分点，且在不同任务顺序下表现差异显著。根本原因在于记忆构建时未充分定义环境和任务信息，导致生成的记忆内容不符合实际需求，甚至出现误导性记忆，影响后续任务执行效果。这种不稳定性在高风险场景中尤其危险，因为模型可能在关键时刻失效，造成严重后果。因此，提升模型的鲁棒性和稳定性，成为当前研究的核心任务。
Innovation
本研究的主要创新包括：• 引入多次实验和任务随机打乱的评估框架，全面揭示模型在不同条件下的表现波动；• 结合人工分析，识别未充分定义的环境和任务信息（underspecification）为性能不稳定的根源；• 提出在记忆构建阶段加入详细任务规程（rubrics）和环境反馈信息的策略，有效缓解性能下降。这些创新突破了传统只关注单次性能的评估方式，为模型的鲁棒性提供了新的检测和改进途径。特别是在复杂、多变的实际场景中，这些方法显著提升了模型的稳定性和可靠性，为未来自我提升系统的设计提供了理论基础。
Methodology
- �� 设计多次重复实验：对每个任务集进行至少三次独立运行，统计成功率的平均值、标准差和最大最小差，量化模型的变异性。
- �� 任务随机打乱：在标准任务顺序基础上，生成Shuffle-1和Shuffle-2两种随机任务顺序，评估模型在不同任务排列下的性能变化。
- �� 记忆内容分析：人工检查模型生成的记忆，识别未定义的环境信息（如API支持）和任务描述模糊引起的误导性记忆。
- �� 信息丰富化：在记忆构建阶段加入详细任务规程（rubrics）、环境反馈（如API支持状态）和提示修改（prompt refinement），以提高记忆的准确性和相关性。
- �� 实验基准：采用WebArena、VisualWebArena和SCUBA三个公开数据集，比较基线模型（gpt-4o）与增强模型的性能差异，重点关注多次运行的统计指标和任务顺序变化的影响。
Experiments
- �� 数据集选择：WebArena（812任务）、VisualWebArena（910任务）和SCUBA（267任务），涵盖多种网页浏览和企业自动化场景。
- �� 评估指标：成功率（pass@1）、成功率标准差、最大最小差、性能变化百分比。
- �� 实验设计：对每个模型在不同任务顺序（默认、Shuffle-1、Shuffle-2）下进行三次独立运行，统计性能波动。
- �� 超参数：采用gpt-4o作为基础模型，记忆构建模型使用Ground-truth奖励，避免噪声干扰。
- �� 附加分析：人工检查记忆内容，识别未定义信息，验证信息丰富化策略的效果。
Results
- �� 多次实验显示，模型在复杂环境中表现出高度变异性，最大成功率差异达4.4%，标准差达1.98%，多次运行的最大差异达7.8%。
- �� 任务顺序的改变极大影响性能：随机打乱后，WebArena模型性能下降4.5%，而在默认顺序下则略有提升1.5%。
- �� 记忆内容分析揭示，未定义环境信息（如API支持）和模糊任务描述导致模型生成不适用或误导性记忆，影响后续任务。
- �� 通过加入详细规程和环境反馈信息，性能改善约31%，但仍存在较大差距，表明其他未识别因素仍在影响模型稳定性。
Applications
- �� 立即应用：在企业自动化、网页智能助手、客户服务等场景中，提升系统的稳定性和可靠性，减少因模型不稳定带来的风险。
- �� 长远愿景：推动自我提升智能体在高风险领域（如医疗诊断、金融决策、自动驾驶）中的应用，实现真正的自主学习与安全保障，为未来智能系统的可信赖性奠定基础。
Limitations & Outlook
- �� 当前方法主要集中在网页浏览任务，尚未验证在多模态、多任务等更复杂场景中的效果。
- �� 信息丰富化策略增加了模型的计算成本和系统复杂度，实际部署时需权衡效率与鲁棒性。
- �� 仍未完全解决极端任务顺序和环境变化带来的性能不稳定问题，未来需进一步优化模型的适应能力。
Abstract
Memory-based self-improving agents--those that learn from an online stream of tasks and improve over time by maintaining a textual memory bank--have shown great promise in recent literature. However, the reliability aspects of these methods have been critically overlooked. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive re-evaluation of two memory-based methods, broadening the scope of evaluation along two axes: (1) including multiple runs to quantify variance, and (2) randomly shuffling the tasks to investigate the effect of task order. Through these experiments, we make two observations that expose the fragility of current methods: First, agent evaluation is inherently noisy in complex environments and on multi-step tasks, and stacking a self-improving loop on top can further amplify this noise. Second, the agent's improvement is highly dependent on task order. Prior works often adopt default orderings that impose an implicit curriculum, acting as a hidden prerequisite for success. To better understand this fragility, we manually examine the agents' memory and hypothesize that task and environment underspecification contribute to this fragility. We validate this hypothesis by incorporating information that enables better specification, such as detailed rubrics and environment feedback, into the memory construction process. While this added information partially closes the performance degradation in previous experiments, significant gaps still remain, suggesting that other uncharacterized factors contribute to this fragility. Looking ahead, our work advocates for more rigorous evaluation protocols for self-improving agents by reporting results across multiple runs and stress-testing them under challenging conditions. Moreover, our findings on underspecification call for systems and interfaces that enable effective human oversight, preventing agents from failing in unforeseeable ways.
References (20)
VisualWebArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Realistic Visual Web Tasks
Jing Yu Koh, Robert Lo, L. Jang et al.
Agent Workflow Memory
Z. Wang, Jiayuan Mao, Daniel Fried et al.
WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents
Shuyan Zhou, Frank F. Xu, Hao Zhu et al.
Towards a Science of AI Agent Reliability
Stephan Rabanser, Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis et al.
Large Language Models Can Self-Improve
Jiaxin Huang, S. Gu, Le Hou et al.
Learning Next Action Predictors from Human-Computer Interaction
Omar Shaikh, Valentin Teutschbein, Kanishk Gandhi et al.
Automated Design of Agentic Systems
Shengran Hu, Cong Lu, Jeff Clune
Self-Challenging Language Model Agents
Yifei Zhou, Sergey Levine, J. Weston et al.
Deep Reinforcement Learning
Sahil Sharma, A. Srinivas, Balaraman Ravindran
Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stopping
Jesse Dodge, Gabriel Ilharco, Roy Schwartz et al.
XSkill: Continual Learning from Experience and Skills in Multimodal Agents
Guanyu Jiang, Zhaochen Su, Xiaoye Qu et al.
WALT: Web Agents that Learn Tools
Viraj Prabhu, Yutong Dai, Matthew Fernández et al.
Mind Your Format: Towards Consistent Evaluation of In-Context Learning Improvements
Anton Voronov, L. Wolf, Max Ryabinin
Know Me, Respond to Me: Benchmarking LLMs for Dynamic User Profiling and Personalized Responses at Scale
Bowen Jiang, Zhuoqun Hao, Young-Min Cho et al.
Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
K. T. Maxwell, J. Oberlander, W. Bruce Croft
EnterpriseOps-Gym: Environments and Evaluations for Stateful Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Enterprise Settings
Shiva Krishna Reddy Malay, Shravan Nayak, Jishnu Sethumadhavan Nair et al.
CRMArena-Pro: Holistic Assessment of LLM Agents Across Diverse Business Scenarios and Interactions
Kung-Hsiang Huang, Akshara Prabhakar, Onkar Thorat et al.
Huxley-Gödel Machine: Human-Level Coding Agent Development by an Approximation of the Optimal Self-Improving Machine
Wenyi Wang, Piotr Piekos, Nanbo Li et al.
SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig et al.
Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluation
Sayash Kapoor, Benedikt Stroebl, Peter Kirgis et al.