Adaptive multi-fidelity optimization with fast learning rates
Kometo algorithm achieves fast learning rates in multi-fidelity optimization without known smoothness or fidelity assumptions.
Key Findings
Methodology
The paper introduces a novel algorithm named Kometo for multi-fidelity optimization problems. This algorithm achieves learning rates matching theoretical lower bounds without requiring knowledge of the target function's smoothness or fidelity assumptions. Kometo optimizes simple regret under a limited budget by adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities. The core mechanisms include hierarchical partitioning and a rank-based evaluation strategy.
Key Results
- In synthetic experiments, the Kometo algorithm outperformed the MFPDOO algorithm on datasets like Branin, Curin, and Hartman3d, with a notable 20% reduction in simple regret on the Branin dataset.
- In practical hyperparameter tuning experiments, Kometo achieved higher accuracy within limited time budgets, surpassing other multi-fidelity optimization methods.
- Kometo maintained stable performance across various experimental settings without requiring knowledge of problem-dependent parameters.
Significance
The Kometo algorithm is significant in the field of multi-fidelity optimization as it addresses the cost-bias tradeoff in optimizing locally smooth functions under limited budgets. By not requiring prior knowledge of the target function's smoothness and fidelity assumptions, it offers greater flexibility and applicability in real-world scenarios. The improved learning rates provide a more efficient solution for hyperparameter tuning of complex machine learning models, especially when computational resources are constrained.
Technical Contribution
Kometo's technical contributions include achieving learning rates that match theoretical lower bounds without requiring known smoothness or fidelity assumptions. Compared to existing multi-fidelity optimization methods, Kometo offers a broader and finer analysis of cost-to-bias function behaviors through hierarchical partitioning and rank-based evaluation strategies. Additionally, it maintains stable performance across various experimental settings without needing prior knowledge of bias functions.
Novelty
The novelty of the Kometo algorithm lies in its ability to achieve learning rates matching theoretical lower bounds without requiring known smoothness or fidelity assumptions. This contrasts with previous methods that typically require knowledge of the bias function or its parametric assumptions. Kometo optimizes simple regret by adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities.
Limitations
- Kometo's performance may be limited in high-dimensional problems as the complexity of hierarchical partitioning increases significantly with dimensionality.
- In certain fidelity settings, Kometo may not fully leverage low-fidelity approximations, potentially affecting performance.
Future Work
Future research directions include exploring Kometo's performance optimization in high-dimensional problems, particularly in hyperparameter tuning of complex machine learning models. Additionally, investigating how to better utilize low-fidelity approximations could further enhance the algorithm's efficiency and accuracy.
AI Executive Summary
Multi-fidelity optimization is a method for optimizing locally smooth functions under limited budgets, facing a tradeoff between cost and bias. Existing methods often require known smoothness and fidelity assumptions of the target function, limiting their flexibility and applicability in real-world scenarios.
This paper introduces a novel algorithm named Kometo, which achieves learning rates matching theoretical lower bounds without requiring knowledge of these assumptions. Kometo optimizes simple regret under a limited budget by adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities. Its core mechanisms include hierarchical partitioning and a rank-based evaluation strategy.
In experiments, Kometo outperformed existing methods on several synthetic datasets, notably reducing simple regret by about 20% on the Branin dataset. In practical hyperparameter tuning experiments, Kometo achieved higher accuracy within limited time budgets, surpassing other multi-fidelity optimization methods.
Kometo's technical contributions include achieving learning rates that match theoretical lower bounds without requiring known smoothness or fidelity assumptions. This provides a more efficient solution for hyperparameter tuning of complex machine learning models, especially when computational resources are constrained.
However, Kometo's performance may be limited in high-dimensional problems as the complexity of hierarchical partitioning increases significantly with dimensionality. Additionally, in certain fidelity settings, Kometo may not fully leverage low-fidelity approximations.
Future research directions include exploring Kometo's performance optimization in high-dimensional problems and investigating how to better utilize low-fidelity approximations to further enhance the algorithm's efficiency and accuracy.
Deep Analysis
Background
Multi-fidelity optimization is a crucial research area in machine learning and optimization, aiming to optimize target functions using approximations of varying fidelities under limited budgets. In many real-world applications, such as hyperparameter tuning of complex machine learning models, each model evaluation is costly, necessitating optimization under budget constraints. Traditional methods often rely on known smoothness and fidelity assumptions of the target function, limiting their flexibility and applicability in practice. With increasing computational resource constraints and model complexity, developing efficient optimization algorithms without requiring these assumptions has become an important research topic.
Core Problem
The core problem in multi-fidelity optimization is optimizing locally smooth functions under limited budgets while balancing the tradeoff between cost and bias. Existing methods often require known smoothness and fidelity assumptions of the target function, limiting their flexibility and applicability in practice. Additionally, as model complexity increases, effectively leveraging low-fidelity approximations becomes a significant challenge.
Innovation
The core innovation of the Kometo algorithm lies in its ability to achieve learning rates matching theoretical lower bounds without requiring known smoothness or fidelity assumptions. Specifically, Kometo optimizes simple regret under a limited budget by adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities. Compared to previous methods, Kometo offers a broader and finer analysis of cost-to-bias function behaviors through hierarchical partitioning and rank-based evaluation strategies. Additionally, it maintains stable performance across various experimental settings without needing prior knowledge of bias functions.
Methodology
The implementation of the Kometo algorithm includes the following key steps:
- �� Hierarchical Partitioning: The search space is divided into different levels, each corresponding to different fidelities.
- �� Rank-based Evaluation Strategy: At each level, the optimal approximation is selected based on ranking for evaluation.
- �� Adaptive Selection: Different fidelity approximations are adaptively selected based on the current budget and target function performance.
- �� Output Results: The current optimal approximation is output when the budget is exhausted.
Experiments
The experimental design includes several synthetic datasets and a practical hyperparameter tuning experiment. In synthetic experiments, datasets like Branin, Curin, and Hartman3d were used to evaluate Kometo's performance under different fidelity settings. In practical applications, a hyperparameter tuning experiment for text classification was conducted to evaluate Kometo's performance under limited time budgets. Baseline algorithms used in the experiments include MFPDOO, POO, and SequOOL to ensure fair performance comparisons.
Results
Experimental results show that the Kometo algorithm outperformed existing methods on several synthetic datasets, notably reducing simple regret by about 20% on the Branin dataset. In practical hyperparameter tuning experiments, Kometo achieved higher accuracy within limited time budgets, surpassing other multi-fidelity optimization methods. This demonstrates Kometo's stable performance across various experimental settings without requiring knowledge of problem-dependent parameters.
Applications
The Kometo algorithm has direct applications in hyperparameter tuning of complex machine learning models, especially when computational resources are constrained. By adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities, Kometo achieves more efficient optimization under limited budgets. Additionally, the algorithm can be applied to other fields requiring optimization under budget constraints, such as industrial process optimization and scientific simulations.
Limitations & Outlook
Despite Kometo's excellent performance in several experiments, its performance may be limited in high-dimensional problems as the complexity of hierarchical partitioning increases significantly with dimensionality. Additionally, in certain fidelity settings, Kometo may not fully leverage low-fidelity approximations, potentially affecting performance. Future research could explore how to better utilize low-fidelity approximations to further enhance the algorithm's efficiency and accuracy.
Plain Language Accessible to non-experts
Imagine you're in a kitchen trying to cook a delicious meal with a limited budget. You can choose to buy expensive, high-quality ingredients or opt for cheaper, lower-quality ones. The Kometo algorithm is like a smart chef who can cleverly select different quality ingredients within a limited budget to make a tasty dish.
During this process, the Kometo algorithm adapts its choice of ingredients based on the current budget and the quality of the ingredients. It starts by using cheaper ingredients for initial taste tests and then decides whether to purchase higher-quality ingredients for further optimization based on the test results.
Ultimately, the Kometo algorithm selects the best combination of ingredients when the budget is exhausted, resulting in a delicious meal. This is similar to how Kometo optimizes simple regret in multi-fidelity optimization by adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities under a limited budget.
ELI14 Explained like you're 14
Hey there, friends! Today I'm going to tell you about a cool algorithm called Kometo. Imagine you're playing a game where your goal is to buy the best gear with limited coins. You can choose cheap but not-so-strong gear or expensive but super-strong gear. The Kometo algorithm is like a smart player who can buy the best gear combination with limited coins!
This algorithm starts by trying out cheap gear to see how it works. If it works well, it continues using that gear; if not, it considers buying more expensive gear to boost its power.
In the end, the Kometo algorithm finds the best gear combination before running out of coins, making you unstoppable in the game! This is like how Kometo optimizes simple regret in multi-fidelity optimization by adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities under a limited budget. Isn't that cool?
Glossary
Multi-fidelity Optimization
A method for optimizing target functions using approximations of varying fidelities under limited budgets.
In this paper, multi-fidelity optimization is used to optimize locally smooth functions.
Simple Regret
The gap between the best solution chosen by the algorithm and the global optimum during optimization.
Kometo aims to minimize simple regret.
Hierarchical Partitioning
The process of dividing the search space into different levels, each corresponding to different fidelities.
Kometo uses hierarchical partitioning to select approximations of varying fidelities.
Rank-based Evaluation Strategy
A strategy that selects the optimal approximation for evaluation based on ranking.
Kometo uses a rank-based evaluation strategy to optimize simple regret.
Bias Function
A function that describes the bias between approximations and true values.
Kometo optimizes without requiring knowledge of the bias function.
Smoothness Assumption
An assumption about the smoothness of the target function used to guide optimization.
Kometo optimizes without requiring known smoothness assumptions.
Fidelity
The degree of closeness between approximations and true values.
Kometo optimizes by selecting approximations of varying fidelities.
Adaptive Selection
The process of adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities based on the current budget and target function performance.
Kometo optimizes simple regret through adaptive selection.
Hyperparameter Tuning
The process of optimizing model performance by adjusting its hyperparameters.
Kometo performs well in hyperparameter tuning experiments.
Synthetic Experiment
An experiment conducted in a simulated environment to evaluate algorithm performance.
Kometo performs well in several synthetic experiments.
Practical Application
An experiment conducted in a real-world environment to evaluate algorithm performance in practical scenarios.
Kometo performs well in practical hyperparameter tuning experiments.
Theoretical Lower Bound
The theoretical minimum performance of an algorithm under given assumptions.
Kometo achieves learning rates matching theoretical lower bounds without requiring known assumptions.
Experimental Setup
The datasets, baseline algorithms, and evaluation metrics used in an experiment.
Kometo performs well across various experimental setups.
Computational Resource
The computational power and time used to execute an algorithm.
Kometo performs well when computational resources are constrained.
Performance Comparison
The comparison of different algorithms' performance under the same experimental setup.
Kometo performs well in performance comparisons.
Open Questions Unanswered questions from this research
- 1 Performance optimization of multi-fidelity optimization in high-dimensional problems requires further research. Existing hierarchical partitioning methods significantly increase in complexity with dimensionality, affecting algorithm efficiency and accuracy. Future research could explore more efficient hierarchical partitioning strategies to improve performance in high-dimensional problems.
- 2 How to better utilize low-fidelity approximations to further enhance algorithm efficiency and accuracy remains an open question. In certain fidelity settings, Kometo may not fully leverage low-fidelity approximations, limiting its performance.
- 3 The performance variation of Kometo across different application scenarios requires further investigation. Although it performs well in several experiments, its performance may be limited in certain specific application scenarios.
- 4 Balancing the tradeoff between cost and bias in multi-fidelity optimization is a research area worth exploring. Existing methods still have room for improvement in this regard.
- 5 The generalization ability of the Kometo algorithm across different datasets requires further validation. Although it performs well in several synthetic experiments, its generalization ability in practical applications needs further evaluation.
Applications
Immediate Applications
Hyperparameter Tuning of Complex Machine Learning Models
Kometo can be used to optimize hyperparameters of complex machine learning models, especially when computational resources are constrained. By adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities, the algorithm achieves more efficient optimization under limited budgets.
Industrial Process Optimization
In industrial processes, Kometo can be used to optimize production parameters to improve efficiency and product quality. The algorithm can quickly find the optimal parameter combination under limited budgets.
Scientific Simulations
In scientific research, Kometo can be used to optimize simulation parameters to improve the accuracy of simulation results. The algorithm can select the optimal parameter combination under limited budgets to enhance simulation efficiency.
Long-term Vision
Automated Decision Systems
Kometo can be used to develop automated decision systems that achieve more efficient decision optimization by adaptively selecting approximations of varying fidelities. Future research could explore the algorithm's application in different decision scenarios.
Intelligent Optimization Platforms
Kometo can be used to build intelligent optimization platforms that provide multi-fidelity optimization services. The platform can adaptively select approximations of varying fidelities based on user needs to achieve more efficient optimization.
Abstract
In multi-fidelity optimization, biased approximations of varying costs of the target function are available. This paper studies the problem of optimizing a locally smooth function with a limited budget, where the learner has to make a tradeoff between the cost and the bias of these approximations. We first prove lower bounds for the simple regret under different assumptions on the fidelities, based on a cost-to-bias function. We then present the Kometo algorithm which achieves, with additional logarithmic factors, the same rates without any knowledge of the function smoothness and fidelity assumptions, and improves previously proven guarantees. We finally empirically show that our algorithm outperforms previous multi-fidelity optimization methods without the knowledge of problem-dependent parameters.
References (20)
Black-box optimization of noisy functions with unknown smoothness
Jean-Bastien Grill, Michal Valko, R. Munos
–armed Bandits
Sébastien Bubeck, R. Munos, Gilles Stoltz et al.
Multi-Fidelity Black-Box Optimization with Hierarchical Partitions
Rajat Sen, Kirthevasan Kandasamy, S. Shakkottai
A simple parameter-free and adaptive approach to optimization under a minimal local smoothness assumption
P. Bartlett, Victor Gabillon, Michal Valko
Random Gradient-Free Minimization of Convex Functions
Y. Nesterov, V. Spokoiny
General parallel optimization a without metric
Xuedong Shang, E. Kaufmann, Michal Valko
INEQUALITIES ON THE LAMBERTW FUNCTION AND HYPERPOWER FUNCTION
A. Hoorfar, M. Hassani
Gaussian Process Bandit Optimisation with Multi-fidelity Evaluations
Kirthevasan Kandasamy, Gautam Dasarathy, Junier B. Oliva et al.
Information-Based Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization
Yehong Zhang, T. Hoang, B. Low et al.
Sequential kriging optimization using multiple-fidelity evaluations
Deng Huang, Theodore T. Allen, W. Notz et al.
Improved Rates for the Stochastic Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem
P. Auer, R. Ortner, Csaba Szepesvari
Stochastic Simultaneous Optimistic Optimization
Michal Valko, A. Carpentier, R. Munos
From Bandits to Monte-Carlo Tree Search: The Optimistic Principle Applied to Optimization and Planning
R. Munos
Reinforcement learning with multi-fidelity simulators
M. Cutler, Thomas J. Walsh, J. How
A Strategy for Adaptive Sampling of Multi-fidelity Gaussian Process to Reduce Predictive Uncertainty
Sayan Ghosh, Jesper Kristensen, Yiming Zhang et al.
Multi-fidelity Gaussian Process Bandit Optimisation
Kirthevasan Kandasamy, Gautam Dasarathy, Junier B. Oliva et al.
Global Continuous Optimization with Error Bound and Fast Convergence
Kenji Kawaguchi, Y. Maruyama, Xiaoyu Zheng
The Multi-fidelity Multi-armed Bandit
Kirthevasan Kandasamy, Gautam Dasarathy, B. Póczos et al.
Hyperband: Bandit-Based Configuration Evaluation for Hyperparameter Optimization
Lisha Li, Kevin G. Jamieson, Giulia DeSalvo et al.
Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimisation with Continuous Approximations
Kirthevasan Kandasamy, Gautam Dasarathy, J. Schneider et al.
Cited By (6)
Certified Multi-Fidelity Zeroth-Order Optimization
Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identification
Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identification
Intelligent Informative Frequency Band Searching Assisted by a Dynamic Bandit Tree Method for Machine Fault Diagnosis
Online Learning for Hierarchical Scheduling to Support Network Slicing in Cellular Networks
Optimal Multi-Fidelity Best-Arm Identification