InterDeepResearch: Enabling Human-Agent Collaborative Information Seeking through Interactive Deep Research
InterDeepResearch enables human-agent collaborative information seeking through an interactive deep research framework, enhancing process observability and real-time steerability.
Key Findings
Methodology
InterDeepResearch employs a dedicated research context management framework to support human-agent collaborative information seeking. This framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels: information, actions, and sessions. It enables dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. The system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking and provides dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation.
Key Results
- Evaluation on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks shows that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study demonstrates its effectiveness in supporting human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process.
- The system provides clear presentation of the agent's research process, enabling users to understand research progress at the macro level while supporting on-demand access to details of individual research actions and their dependencies at the micro level.
- Users can flexibly intervene and guide the agent's research direction during the process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.
Significance
InterDeepResearch breaks away from the traditional one-way query-to-report paradigm of deep research systems, allowing users to actively participate and intervene in the research process. This human-agent collaborative information seeking approach not only improves research efficiency and accuracy but also provides users with greater control and flexibility, better accommodating their personal insights and evolving research intents.
Technical Contribution
The technical contributions of InterDeepResearch include the introduction of a novel research context management framework that effectively organizes and manages complex research processes. It addresses the issue of LLM context exhaustion through dynamic context reduction and cross-action backtracing mechanisms. Additionally, the system's interactive design enables users to more intuitively understand and participate in the research process, enhancing the efficiency of human-agent collaboration.
Novelty
InterDeepResearch is the first to introduce human-agent collaboration into deep research systems, achieving active user participation and real-time intervention through an interactive research context management framework and multi-view interface design. This innovative system design is unprecedented in existing deep research systems.
Limitations
- The system may face challenges in handling particularly complex or long-duration research tasks, as context management, despite dynamic reduction mechanisms, may still lead to performance degradation in extreme cases.
- For domains requiring highly specialized knowledge, the system's performance may be limited as the LLM agent's knowledge base might not cover all domain-specific details.
- The user interface and interaction mechanisms of the system may require further optimization to accommodate different user habits and needs.
Future Work
Future research directions include further optimizing the research context management framework to enhance system performance in handling long-duration and complex research tasks. Additionally, exploring the integration of more user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms into the system could enhance user experience and system adaptability.
AI Executive Summary
In recent years, deep research systems have proliferated across academia and industry. These systems, equipped with LLM-based agents, can automatically perform information search, collection, and synthesis to address complex research goals posed by users. However, existing deep research systems are predominantly designed for a single-turn query-to-report paradigm, limiting users to a passive role without the opportunity to participate in the research process.
InterDeepResearch introduces a dedicated research context management framework to support human-agent collaborative information seeking. This framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels: information, actions, and sessions. It enables dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. The system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking and provides dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation.
Evaluation on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks shows that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study demonstrates its effectiveness in supporting human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process. Users can flexibly intervene and guide the agent's research direction during the process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.
InterDeepResearch breaks away from the traditional one-way query-to-report paradigm of deep research systems, allowing users to actively participate and intervene in the research process. This human-agent collaborative information seeking approach not only improves research efficiency and accuracy but also provides users with greater control and flexibility, better accommodating their personal insights and evolving research intents.
Future research directions include further optimizing the research context management framework to enhance system performance in handling long-duration and complex research tasks. Additionally, exploring the integration of more user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms into the system could enhance user experience and system adaptability.
Deep Analysis
Background
Deep research systems have recently gained widespread application in academia and industry. These systems, equipped with LLM-based agents, can automatically perform information search, collection, and synthesis to address complex research goals posed by users. Traditional information retrieval systems typically rely on hard-coded retrieval workflows, while Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods leverage LLMs' general intelligence to process intermediate information but still maintain rigid workflows. In contrast, deep research systems fully exploit the autonomy of LLM-based agents, enabling them to proactively plan, invoke information retrieval tools, and process information like human researchers, thereby accomplishing more complex and long-horizon information seeking tasks.
Core Problem
Despite significant advances, existing deep research systems are predominantly designed for a single-turn query-to-report paradigm, limiting users to a passive role without the opportunity to participate in the research process. However, substantial research in information retrieval has established that many information seeking tasks benefit significantly from human-in-the-loop collaboration, particularly when users need to contribute personal insights, contextual knowledge, and evolving research intents that cannot be fully captured in initial queries. This need for user involvement manifests in two ways during deep research: at a high level, users may need to adjust research strategies based on emerging insights; at a low level, users may need to intervene on critical execution details, such as correcting the agent when it relies on incorrect assumptions or specifying precise search keywords that require contextual knowledge.
Innovation
InterDeepResearch introduces a dedicated research context management framework to support human-agent collaborative information seeking. This framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels: information, actions, and sessions. It enables dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. The system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking and provides dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation. This innovative system design is unprecedented in existing deep research systems.
Methodology
- �� Research Context Management Framework: Organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with information, actions, and sessions.
- �� Dynamic Context Reduction: Prevents LLM context exhaustion.
- �� Cross-action Backtracing: Traces conclusions back to supporting evidence.
- �� System Interface: Integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking.
- �� Interaction Mechanisms: Supports interactive research context navigation.
Experiments
Evaluations on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks demonstrate that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study shows that the system effectively supports human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.
Results
Evaluations on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks demonstrate that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study shows that the system effectively supports human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process. Users can flexibly intervene and guide the agent's research direction during the process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.
Applications
InterDeepResearch can be directly applied in scenarios such as academic research, market analysis, and domain-specific investigations. The system's dynamic context management and interaction mechanisms make it adaptable to different user needs, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of information retrieval.
Limitations & Outlook
Despite significant advances, the system may face challenges in handling particularly complex or long-duration research tasks, as context management, despite dynamic reduction mechanisms, may still lead to performance degradation in extreme cases. Additionally, for domains requiring highly specialized knowledge, the system's performance may be limited as the LLM agent's knowledge base might not cover all domain-specific details. The user interface and interaction mechanisms of the system may require further optimization to accommodate different user habits and needs.
Plain Language Accessible to non-experts
Imagine you're cooking in a kitchen. Traditional deep research systems are like an automatic cooking robot that prepares a dish based on your initial instructions, but you can't intervene during the process. InterDeepResearch, on the other hand, is like a smart assistant that not only cooks based on your instructions but also allows you to adjust the cooking process when you discover new ingredients or want to change the recipe. This system uses a dedicated management framework to organize all the ingredients, steps, and processes, ensuring you can view and adjust them whenever needed. This way, you can better participate in the entire cooking process, ensuring the final dish meets your taste and needs.
ELI14 Explained like you're 14
Hey there, buddy! Imagine you're playing a super complex game. Traditional deep research systems are like an automatic game assistant that completes tasks based on your initial instructions, but you can't make any adjustments during the process. InterDeepResearch, however, is like a smart game partner that not only completes tasks based on your instructions but also allows you to adjust the game process when you discover new clues or want to change strategies. This system uses a dedicated management framework to organize all the clues, steps, and processes, ensuring you can view and adjust them whenever needed. This way, you can better participate in the entire game process, ensuring the final victory meets your expectations!
Glossary
Deep Research System
An application system that leverages LLM-based agents to conduct long-horizon information search, collection, and synthesis.
Used in the paper to describe automated information retrieval systems.
LLM-based Agent
An intelligent agent based on large language models, capable of automatically performing information retrieval and processing.
Describes the core component of the system in the paper.
Context Management Framework
A framework for organizing and managing information and actions during the research process.
Describes the innovative design of the system in the paper.
Dynamic Context Reduction
A mechanism to prevent LLM context exhaustion by dynamically reducing irrelevant information to optimize performance.
Describes a key mechanism of the system in the paper.
Cross-action Backtracing
A mechanism for tracing research conclusions back to their supporting evidence.
Describes a key function of the system in the paper.
Information Retrieval
The process of searching and extracting relevant information from large datasets.
Describes the core task of the system in the paper.
Research Session
A collection of consecutive research actions for macro-level research process management.
Describes the hierarchical structure of the system in the paper.
User Intervention
The act of users actively participating and adjusting research direction during the process.
Describes the interaction mechanism of the system in the paper.
Benchmark Test
Standardized tests used to evaluate system performance.
Describes the performance evaluation of the system in the paper.
Visual Sensemaking
The ability to help users understand and participate in the research process through a visual interface.
Describes the interface design of the system in the paper.
Open Questions Unanswered questions from this research
- 1 How can the research context management framework be further optimized to enhance system performance in handling long-duration and complex research tasks? Existing methods may lead to performance degradation in some cases, requiring more effective solutions.
- 2 In domains requiring highly specialized knowledge, how can the LLM agent's knowledge base be expanded to cover all domain-specific details? Existing knowledge bases may not meet the needs of all fields.
- 3 How can the system's user interface and interaction mechanisms be further optimized to accommodate different user habits and needs? Existing designs may not meet the expectations of all users.
- 4 How can user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms be better supported in a user-involved scenario? Existing systems may not fully meet user personalization needs.
- 5 How can more user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms be integrated without affecting system performance? Existing designs may require further optimization.
Applications
Immediate Applications
Academic Research
Researchers can use InterDeepResearch for literature reviews and domain investigations, improving research efficiency and accuracy.
Market Analysis
Market analysts can utilize the system's dynamic context management and interaction mechanisms to quickly acquire market information and adjust analysis strategies.
Domain-specific Investigations
Professionals can use the system for in-depth investigations in specific fields, obtaining detailed background information and the latest developments.
Long-term Vision
Intelligent Assistant
InterDeepResearch can evolve into an intelligent assistant, helping users perform information retrieval and decision support in various complex tasks.
Automated Research Platform
The system can expand into an automated research platform, supporting multi-user collaboration and cross-domain research, driving scientific discovery and innovation.
Abstract
Deep research systems powered by LLM agents have transformed complex information seeking by automating the iterative retrieval, filtering, and synthesis of insights from massive-scale web sources. However, existing systems predominantly follow an autonomous "query-to-report" paradigm, limiting users to a passive role and failing to integrate their personal insights, contextual knowledge, and evolving research intents. This paper addresses the lack of human-in-the-loop collaboration in the agentic research process. Through a formative study, we identify that current systems hinder effective human-agent collaboration in terms of process observability, real-time steerability, and context navigation efficiency. Informed by these findings, we propose InterDeepResearch, an interactive deep research system backed by a dedicated research context management framework. The framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels (information, actions, and sessions), enabling dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. Built upon this framework, the system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking, and dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation. Evaluation on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks shows that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems, while a formal user study demonstrates its effectiveness in supporting human-agent collaborative information seeking. Project page with system demo: https://github.com/bopan3/InterDeepResearch.
References (20)
Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm
Ryen W. White, Resa A. Roth
SenseMap: Supporting browser-based online sensemaking through analytic provenance
P. Nguyen, Kai Xu, A. Bardill et al.
Graphologue: Exploring Large Language Model Responses with Interactive Diagrams
Peiling Jiang, Jude Rayan, Steven W. Dow et al.
Coagmento- A Collaborative Information Seeking, Synthesis and Sense-Making Framework (an integrated
C. Shah
Litforager: Exploring Multimodal Literature Foraging Strategies in Immersive Sensemaking
Haoyang Yang, Elliott H. Faa, Weijiang Liu et al.
GenSERP: Large Language Models for Whole Page Presentation
Zhenning Zhang, Yunan Zhang, Suyu Ge et al.
A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems
I. Ruthven, M. Lalmas
Scent of Knowledge: Optimizing Search-Enhanced Reasoning with Information Foraging
Hongjin Qian, Zheng Liu
Interactions with Search Systems
Ryen W. White
SearchLab: Exploring Conversational and Traditional Search Interfaces in Information Retrieval
Saber Zerhoudi, Michael Granitzer
Deep Researcher with Test-Time Diffusion
Rujun Han, Yanfei Chen, Zoey CuiZhu et al.
SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search
M. Morris, E. Horvitz
Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation
Sangho Suh, Meng Chen, Bryan Min et al.
Faceted search on coordinated tablets and tabletop: a comparison
Sven Charleer, J. Klerkx, E. Duval et al.
Where should the person stop and the information search interface start?
M. Bates
引言 (Introduction)
吕一旭 Yixu Lu
고객과 지식 Marketing
김정남
OpenEvidence
V. Wu, Jed Casauay
Information Seeking in Electronic Environments
G. Marchionini
Evaluating the Benefits of the Immersive Space to Think
Lee Lisle, Virginia Tech, Xiaoyu Chen et al.