InterDeepResearch: Enabling Human-Agent Collaborative Information Seeking through Interactive Deep Research

TL;DR

InterDeepResearch enables human-agent collaborative information seeking through an interactive deep research framework, enhancing process observability and real-time steerability.

cs.IR 🔴 Advanced 2026-03-13 2 views
Bo Pan Lunke Pan Yitao Zhou Qi Jiang Zhen Wen Minfeng Zhu Wei Chen
deep research human-agent collaboration information retrieval interactive systems LLM agents

Key Findings

Methodology

InterDeepResearch employs a dedicated research context management framework to support human-agent collaborative information seeking. This framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels: information, actions, and sessions. It enables dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. The system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking and provides dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation.

Key Results

  • Evaluation on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks shows that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study demonstrates its effectiveness in supporting human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process.
  • The system provides clear presentation of the agent's research process, enabling users to understand research progress at the macro level while supporting on-demand access to details of individual research actions and their dependencies at the micro level.
  • Users can flexibly intervene and guide the agent's research direction during the process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.

Significance

InterDeepResearch breaks away from the traditional one-way query-to-report paradigm of deep research systems, allowing users to actively participate and intervene in the research process. This human-agent collaborative information seeking approach not only improves research efficiency and accuracy but also provides users with greater control and flexibility, better accommodating their personal insights and evolving research intents.

Technical Contribution

The technical contributions of InterDeepResearch include the introduction of a novel research context management framework that effectively organizes and manages complex research processes. It addresses the issue of LLM context exhaustion through dynamic context reduction and cross-action backtracing mechanisms. Additionally, the system's interactive design enables users to more intuitively understand and participate in the research process, enhancing the efficiency of human-agent collaboration.

Novelty

InterDeepResearch is the first to introduce human-agent collaboration into deep research systems, achieving active user participation and real-time intervention through an interactive research context management framework and multi-view interface design. This innovative system design is unprecedented in existing deep research systems.

Limitations

  • The system may face challenges in handling particularly complex or long-duration research tasks, as context management, despite dynamic reduction mechanisms, may still lead to performance degradation in extreme cases.
  • For domains requiring highly specialized knowledge, the system's performance may be limited as the LLM agent's knowledge base might not cover all domain-specific details.
  • The user interface and interaction mechanisms of the system may require further optimization to accommodate different user habits and needs.

Future Work

Future research directions include further optimizing the research context management framework to enhance system performance in handling long-duration and complex research tasks. Additionally, exploring the integration of more user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms into the system could enhance user experience and system adaptability.

AI Executive Summary

In recent years, deep research systems have proliferated across academia and industry. These systems, equipped with LLM-based agents, can automatically perform information search, collection, and synthesis to address complex research goals posed by users. However, existing deep research systems are predominantly designed for a single-turn query-to-report paradigm, limiting users to a passive role without the opportunity to participate in the research process.

InterDeepResearch introduces a dedicated research context management framework to support human-agent collaborative information seeking. This framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels: information, actions, and sessions. It enables dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. The system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking and provides dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation.

Evaluation on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks shows that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study demonstrates its effectiveness in supporting human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process. Users can flexibly intervene and guide the agent's research direction during the process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.

InterDeepResearch breaks away from the traditional one-way query-to-report paradigm of deep research systems, allowing users to actively participate and intervene in the research process. This human-agent collaborative information seeking approach not only improves research efficiency and accuracy but also provides users with greater control and flexibility, better accommodating their personal insights and evolving research intents.

Future research directions include further optimizing the research context management framework to enhance system performance in handling long-duration and complex research tasks. Additionally, exploring the integration of more user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms into the system could enhance user experience and system adaptability.

Deep Analysis

Background

Deep research systems have recently gained widespread application in academia and industry. These systems, equipped with LLM-based agents, can automatically perform information search, collection, and synthesis to address complex research goals posed by users. Traditional information retrieval systems typically rely on hard-coded retrieval workflows, while Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods leverage LLMs' general intelligence to process intermediate information but still maintain rigid workflows. In contrast, deep research systems fully exploit the autonomy of LLM-based agents, enabling them to proactively plan, invoke information retrieval tools, and process information like human researchers, thereby accomplishing more complex and long-horizon information seeking tasks.

Core Problem

Despite significant advances, existing deep research systems are predominantly designed for a single-turn query-to-report paradigm, limiting users to a passive role without the opportunity to participate in the research process. However, substantial research in information retrieval has established that many information seeking tasks benefit significantly from human-in-the-loop collaboration, particularly when users need to contribute personal insights, contextual knowledge, and evolving research intents that cannot be fully captured in initial queries. This need for user involvement manifests in two ways during deep research: at a high level, users may need to adjust research strategies based on emerging insights; at a low level, users may need to intervene on critical execution details, such as correcting the agent when it relies on incorrect assumptions or specifying precise search keywords that require contextual knowledge.

Innovation

InterDeepResearch introduces a dedicated research context management framework to support human-agent collaborative information seeking. This framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels: information, actions, and sessions. It enables dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. The system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking and provides dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation. This innovative system design is unprecedented in existing deep research systems.

Methodology

  • �� Research Context Management Framework: Organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with information, actions, and sessions.
  • �� Dynamic Context Reduction: Prevents LLM context exhaustion.
  • �� Cross-action Backtracing: Traces conclusions back to supporting evidence.
  • �� System Interface: Integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking.
  • �� Interaction Mechanisms: Supports interactive research context navigation.

Experiments

Evaluations on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks demonstrate that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study shows that the system effectively supports human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.

Results

Evaluations on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks demonstrate that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems. A formal user study shows that the system effectively supports human-agent collaborative information seeking, allowing users to better participate in and guide the research process. Users can flexibly intervene and guide the agent's research direction during the process. The system supports users to pause research, inject new requirements, adjust strategies, and redirect focus based on emerging insights without restarting the entire research cycle.

Applications

InterDeepResearch can be directly applied in scenarios such as academic research, market analysis, and domain-specific investigations. The system's dynamic context management and interaction mechanisms make it adaptable to different user needs, enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of information retrieval.

Limitations & Outlook

Despite significant advances, the system may face challenges in handling particularly complex or long-duration research tasks, as context management, despite dynamic reduction mechanisms, may still lead to performance degradation in extreme cases. Additionally, for domains requiring highly specialized knowledge, the system's performance may be limited as the LLM agent's knowledge base might not cover all domain-specific details. The user interface and interaction mechanisms of the system may require further optimization to accommodate different user habits and needs.

Plain Language Accessible to non-experts

Imagine you're cooking in a kitchen. Traditional deep research systems are like an automatic cooking robot that prepares a dish based on your initial instructions, but you can't intervene during the process. InterDeepResearch, on the other hand, is like a smart assistant that not only cooks based on your instructions but also allows you to adjust the cooking process when you discover new ingredients or want to change the recipe. This system uses a dedicated management framework to organize all the ingredients, steps, and processes, ensuring you can view and adjust them whenever needed. This way, you can better participate in the entire cooking process, ensuring the final dish meets your taste and needs.

ELI14 Explained like you're 14

Hey there, buddy! Imagine you're playing a super complex game. Traditional deep research systems are like an automatic game assistant that completes tasks based on your initial instructions, but you can't make any adjustments during the process. InterDeepResearch, however, is like a smart game partner that not only completes tasks based on your instructions but also allows you to adjust the game process when you discover new clues or want to change strategies. This system uses a dedicated management framework to organize all the clues, steps, and processes, ensuring you can view and adjust them whenever needed. This way, you can better participate in the entire game process, ensuring the final victory meets your expectations!

Glossary

Deep Research System

An application system that leverages LLM-based agents to conduct long-horizon information search, collection, and synthesis.

Used in the paper to describe automated information retrieval systems.

LLM-based Agent

An intelligent agent based on large language models, capable of automatically performing information retrieval and processing.

Describes the core component of the system in the paper.

Context Management Framework

A framework for organizing and managing information and actions during the research process.

Describes the innovative design of the system in the paper.

Dynamic Context Reduction

A mechanism to prevent LLM context exhaustion by dynamically reducing irrelevant information to optimize performance.

Describes a key mechanism of the system in the paper.

Cross-action Backtracing

A mechanism for tracing research conclusions back to their supporting evidence.

Describes a key function of the system in the paper.

Information Retrieval

The process of searching and extracting relevant information from large datasets.

Describes the core task of the system in the paper.

Research Session

A collection of consecutive research actions for macro-level research process management.

Describes the hierarchical structure of the system in the paper.

User Intervention

The act of users actively participating and adjusting research direction during the process.

Describes the interaction mechanism of the system in the paper.

Benchmark Test

Standardized tests used to evaluate system performance.

Describes the performance evaluation of the system in the paper.

Visual Sensemaking

The ability to help users understand and participate in the research process through a visual interface.

Describes the interface design of the system in the paper.

Open Questions Unanswered questions from this research

  • 1 How can the research context management framework be further optimized to enhance system performance in handling long-duration and complex research tasks? Existing methods may lead to performance degradation in some cases, requiring more effective solutions.
  • 2 In domains requiring highly specialized knowledge, how can the LLM agent's knowledge base be expanded to cover all domain-specific details? Existing knowledge bases may not meet the needs of all fields.
  • 3 How can the system's user interface and interaction mechanisms be further optimized to accommodate different user habits and needs? Existing designs may not meet the expectations of all users.
  • 4 How can user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms be better supported in a user-involved scenario? Existing systems may not fully meet user personalization needs.
  • 5 How can more user personalization needs and feedback mechanisms be integrated without affecting system performance? Existing designs may require further optimization.

Applications

Immediate Applications

Academic Research

Researchers can use InterDeepResearch for literature reviews and domain investigations, improving research efficiency and accuracy.

Market Analysis

Market analysts can utilize the system's dynamic context management and interaction mechanisms to quickly acquire market information and adjust analysis strategies.

Domain-specific Investigations

Professionals can use the system for in-depth investigations in specific fields, obtaining detailed background information and the latest developments.

Long-term Vision

Intelligent Assistant

InterDeepResearch can evolve into an intelligent assistant, helping users perform information retrieval and decision support in various complex tasks.

Automated Research Platform

The system can expand into an automated research platform, supporting multi-user collaboration and cross-domain research, driving scientific discovery and innovation.

Abstract

Deep research systems powered by LLM agents have transformed complex information seeking by automating the iterative retrieval, filtering, and synthesis of insights from massive-scale web sources. However, existing systems predominantly follow an autonomous "query-to-report" paradigm, limiting users to a passive role and failing to integrate their personal insights, contextual knowledge, and evolving research intents. This paper addresses the lack of human-in-the-loop collaboration in the agentic research process. Through a formative study, we identify that current systems hinder effective human-agent collaboration in terms of process observability, real-time steerability, and context navigation efficiency. Informed by these findings, we propose InterDeepResearch, an interactive deep research system backed by a dedicated research context management framework. The framework organizes research context into a hierarchical architecture with three levels (information, actions, and sessions), enabling dynamic context reduction to prevent LLM context exhaustion and cross-action backtracing for evidence provenance. Built upon this framework, the system interface integrates three coordinated views for visual sensemaking, and dedicated interaction mechanisms for interactive research context navigation. Evaluation on the Xbench-DeepSearch-v1 and Seal-0 benchmarks shows that InterDeepResearch achieves competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art deep research systems, while a formal user study demonstrates its effectiveness in supporting human-agent collaborative information seeking. Project page with system demo: https://github.com/bopan3/InterDeepResearch.

cs.IR cs.HC

References (20)

Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm

Ryen W. White, Resa A. Roth

2009 893 citations

SenseMap: Supporting browser-based online sensemaking through analytic provenance

P. Nguyen, Kai Xu, A. Bardill et al.

2016 44 citations

Graphologue: Exploring Large Language Model Responses with Interactive Diagrams

Peiling Jiang, Jude Rayan, Steven W. Dow et al.

2023 166 citations View Analysis →

Coagmento- A Collaborative Information Seeking, Synthesis and Sense-Making Framework (an integrated

C. Shah

2009 77 citations

Litforager: Exploring Multimodal Literature Foraging Strategies in Immersive Sensemaking

Haoyang Yang, Elliott H. Faa, Weijiang Liu et al.

2025 4 citations View Analysis →

GenSERP: Large Language Models for Whole Page Presentation

Zhenning Zhang, Yunan Zhang, Suyu Ge et al.

2024 3 citations View Analysis →

A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems

I. Ruthven, M. Lalmas

2003 494 citations

Scent of Knowledge: Optimizing Search-Enhanced Reasoning with Information Foraging

Hongjin Qian, Zheng Liu

2025 12 citations View Analysis →

Interactions with Search Systems

Ryen W. White

2016 148 citations

SearchLab: Exploring Conversational and Traditional Search Interfaces in Information Retrieval

Saber Zerhoudi, Michael Granitzer

2025 3 citations

Deep Researcher with Test-Time Diffusion

Rujun Han, Yanfei Chen, Zoey CuiZhu et al.

2025 17 citations

SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search

M. Morris, E. Horvitz

2007 468 citations

Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation

Sangho Suh, Meng Chen, Bryan Min et al.

2023 144 citations View Analysis →

Faceted search on coordinated tablets and tabletop: a comparison

Sven Charleer, J. Klerkx, E. Duval et al.

2016 6 citations

Where should the person stop and the information search interface start?

M. Bates

1990 421 citations

引言 (Introduction)

吕一旭 Yixu Lu

2009 83070 citations

고객과 지식 Marketing

김정남

2003 2087 citations

OpenEvidence

V. Wu, Jed Casauay

2024 22 citations

Information Seeking in Electronic Environments

G. Marchionini

1995 1663 citations

Evaluating the Benefits of the Immersive Space to Think

Lee Lisle, Virginia Tech, Xiaoyu Chen et al.

2020 44 citations