CG-Bench: Clue-grounded Question Answering Benchmark for Long Video Understanding

TL;DR

CG-Bench is a clue-grounded QA benchmark for long video understanding with 12,129 QA pairs.

cs.CV 🔴 Advanced 2024-12-17 15 views
Guo Chen Yicheng Liu Yifei Huang Yuping He Baoqi Pei Jilan Xu Yali Wang Tong Lu Limin Wang
video understanding multimodal QA long video benchmark

Key Findings

Methodology

CG-Bench evaluates long video understanding through clue-grounded QA, designing white-box and black-box evaluation methods to ensure models generate answers based on correct video understanding.

Key Results

  • Current models underperform in long video understanding, with GPT-4o scoring 53.9 on long-video MCQs, while Gemini-1.5 Pro scores 43.4.
  • Open-source model Qwen2-VL-72B scores 51.4 under the same conditions, showing a gap with commercial models.
  • Accuracy in long video understanding drops from 53.9 to 21.7, indicating significant room for improvement.

Significance

CG-Bench fills the gap in long video understanding evaluation, promoting the development of more trustworthy multimodal large language models, addressing the issue of existing benchmarks focusing only on short videos.

Technical Contribution

CG-Bench introduces clue-based evaluation methods, improving the credibility assessment of models in long video understanding, providing more reliable performance evaluations.

Novelty

CG-Bench is the first benchmark focusing on clue-grounded QA for long videos, differing from traditional MCQ evaluations by emphasizing model answers based on video clues.

Limitations

  • Current models perform poorly in long video understanding, especially in clue localization.
  • Significant performance gap exists between open-source and commercial models.

Future Work

Future research could explore improving models' clue localization abilities, developing more efficient long video understanding algorithms.

AI Executive Summary

CG-Bench is an innovative benchmark for long video understanding, addressing the issue of existing benchmarks focusing only on short videos. This benchmark evaluates models' long video understanding capabilities through clue-grounded QA, designing white-box and black-box evaluation methods to ensure models generate answers based on correct video understanding. Experimental results show current models perform poorly in long video understanding, especially in clue localization. The release of CG-Bench fills the gap in long video understanding evaluation, promoting the development of more trustworthy multimodal large language models. Future research could explore improving models' clue localization abilities, developing more efficient long video understanding algorithms.

Deep Analysis

Background

The video understanding field has made significant progress with the development of multimodal large language models. Early benchmarks primarily focused on short videos, while evaluations for long video understanding remain lacking.

Core Problem

Existing long video understanding benchmarks mainly rely on MCQs, where models can achieve correct answers through elimination without genuinely understanding the video content.

Innovation

CG-Bench introduces clue-based QA evaluation methods, designing white-box and black-box evaluation mechanisms to ensure models generate answers based on correct video clues.

Methodology

  • �� Video Collection: Manually collect videos longer than 10 minutes.
  • �� QA Clue Annotation: Create 12,129 QA clue triplets.
  • �� Evaluation Methods: Design white-box and black-box evaluation mechanisms.

Experiments

Evaluate multiple closed-source and open-source models, comparing differences in long and short video understanding capabilities.

Results

Commercial model GPT-4o scores 53.9 on long-video MCQs, while open-source model Qwen2-VL-72B scores 51.4.

Applications

CG-Bench can be used to evaluate multimodal large language models' long video understanding capabilities, promoting the development of related technologies.

Limitations & Outlook

Current models perform poorly in long video understanding, especially in clue localization.

Plain Language Accessible to non-experts

Imagine you're watching a movie, and CG-Bench is like a guide helping you understand the plot. It doesn't just ask you what happened in the movie but also tells you which scenes are key clues, helping you better understand the whole story.

ELI14 Explained like you're 14

Hey, friends! Imagine you're watching a super long movie, and CG-Bench is like your super helper, finding the most important scenes in the movie, helping you quickly answer those tricky questions. Isn't that cool?

Glossary

Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)

Models that integrate visual and textual information for video understanding.

Used to evaluate long video understanding capabilities.

Clue-grounded QA

Evaluation method based on video clues for QA.

Ensures models generate answers based on correct video understanding.

White-box evaluation

Evaluation method where models directly output clue intervals.

Used to assess models' clue localization abilities.

Black-box evaluation

Evaluates models' ability to implicitly seek clues.

Assesses models' clue localization abilities in long videos.

Temporal Intersection over Union (tIoU)

Evaluates overlap between predicted and actual clue intervals.

Used in white-box evaluation for clue localization.

Open Questions Unanswered questions from this research

  • 1 How to improve models' clue localization abilities in long videos?
  • 2 How to narrow the performance gap between open-source and commercial models in long video understanding?

Applications

Immediate Applications

Video Analysis

Researchers can use CG-Bench to evaluate multimodal models' long video understanding capabilities.

Long-term Vision

Intelligent Video Understanding

Develop more efficient long video understanding algorithms, advancing intelligent video analysis technology.

Abstract

Most existing video understanding benchmarks for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) focus only on short videos. The limited number of benchmarks for long video understanding often rely solely on multiple-choice questions (MCQs). However, because of the inherent limitation of MCQ-based evaluation and the increasing reasoning ability of MLLMs, models can give the current answer purely by combining short video understanding with elimination, without genuinely understanding the video content. To address this gap, we introduce CG-Bench, a novel benchmark designed for clue-grounded question answering in long videos. CG-Bench emphasizes the model's ability to retrieve relevant clues for questions, enhancing evaluation credibility. It features 1,219 manually curated videos categorized by a granular system with 14 primary categories, 171 secondary categories, and 638 tertiary categories, making it the largest benchmark for long video analysis. The benchmark includes 12,129 QA pairs in three major question types: perception, reasoning, and hallucination. Compensating the drawbacks of pure MCQ-based evaluation, we design two novel clue-based evaluation methods: clue-grounded white box and black box evaluations, to assess whether the model generates answers based on the correct understanding of the video. We evaluate multiple closed-source and open-source MLLMs on CG-Bench. Results indicate that current models significantly underperform in understanding long videos compared to short ones, and a significant gap exists between open-source and commercial models. We hope CG-Bench can advance the development of more trustworthy and capable MLLMs for long video understanding. All annotations and video data are released at https://cg-bench.github.io/leaderboard/.

cs.CV