A Simple LLM Framework for Long-Range Video Question-Answering
LLoVi combines short-term visual captions with large models for long video QA, achieving 50.3% accuracy.
Key Findings
Methodology
The approach segments long videos into short clips, uses pretrained visual captioners (e.g., BLIP2, LaViLa) to generate textual descriptions, then employs GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 for long-range reasoning. A novel multi-round summarization prompt filters noise, enhancing QA performance. The system is model-agnostic, training-free, and emphasizes component choices and prompt design.
Key Results
- On EgoSchema, LLoVi achieves 50.3% accuracy, outperforming previous methods by 18.1%. It also improves 4.1% on NExT-QA and 3.1% on IntentQA. When extended to grounded LVQA, it surpasses all prior approaches, demonstrating broad applicability.
- Among visual captioners, LaViLa yields the best results (55.2%), while GPT-4 provides the highest performance (61.2%). Short video clips (1s) sampling outperforms longer segments, with an 8x efficiency gain and only 2% accuracy loss.
- The multi-round summarization prompt significantly boosts performance (+3.6%), confirming the importance of prompt engineering and component selection.
Significance
This work addresses the bottleneck of complex long-range video modeling by leveraging large language models' reasoning capabilities. It simplifies the pipeline, reduces training needs, and broadens the applicability of long video understanding, opening new avenues for zero-shot and scalable video analysis in industry and research.
Technical Contribution
The paper introduces a two-stage framework: short clip captioning and large model reasoning, with a multi-round summarization prompt to filter noise. It demonstrates that simple, model-agnostic design can outperform complex architectures, establishing a strong zero-shot baseline for long video QA.
Novelty
This is the first to combine short-term captioning with large model reasoning via multi-round prompts for long video QA. Unlike prior complex models, it emphasizes simplicity and effectiveness, leveraging the reasoning power of foundation models in a novel way.
Limitations
- Performance heavily depends on caption quality; noisy or incomplete captions impair reasoning accuracy. Improving captioning robustness remains a challenge.
- In extremely long videos, sampling may lead to information loss, affecting comprehension.
- Large models like GPT-4 are computationally expensive, limiting deployment in resource-constrained environments.
Future Work
Future directions include multimodal integration (audio, text, vision), end-to-end training of captioning and reasoning modules, and real-time long video analysis. Reducing computational costs and enhancing robustness are also key goals.
AI Executive Summary
Understanding long videos remains a significant challenge in artificial intelligence, primarily due to the complexity of modeling extended temporal dependencies. Traditional approaches rely on sophisticated, resource-intensive architectures such as memory queues, space-time graphs, and state-space layers, which are costly and difficult to scale. While short video understanding has advanced rapidly, extending these methods to hours-long content has proven difficult. Recently, large language models like GPT-4 have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in long-range reasoning across various domains, inspiring new approaches for long video comprehension.
This paper introduces LLoVi, a simple yet powerful framework that leverages existing visual captioning models and large language models to address long-range video question-answering (LVQA). The core idea is to segment long videos into short clips, generate textual descriptions for each using pretrained captioners like LaViLa or BLIP2, and then concatenate these descriptions into a comprehensive textual representation. A specially designed multi-round summarization prompt guides the large model to filter noise and focus on relevant information, significantly boosting QA accuracy.
Experimental results on the EgoSchema dataset show that LLoVi achieves 50.3% accuracy, outperforming previous methods by 18.1%. It also surpasses state-of-the-art baselines on NExT-QA and IntentQA, demonstrating its robustness and generality. The choice of captioner and large model critically influences performance, with LaViLa and GPT-4 providing the best results. Shorter clips (1s) sampling strategies outperform longer segments, balancing efficiency and accuracy.
The approach’s simplicity, zero-shot capability, and flexibility make it highly promising for practical applications such as long video retrieval, automated content analysis, and assistive AI systems. Future work will focus on multimodal fusion, end-to-end training, and reducing computational costs, aiming to make long video understanding more accessible and scalable across industries.
Deep Analysis
Background
Long video understanding has been a longstanding challenge, with early methods relying on complex temporal modeling like memory queues, space-time graphs, and state-space layers. While these approaches achieved some success, their high computational cost and limited scalability hinder widespread adoption. Recent advances in short video understanding have benefited from deep learning models, but extending these to hours-long content remains difficult due to the need for sophisticated reasoning over extended temporal spans. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 has opened new avenues, demonstrating impressive capabilities in long-horizon reasoning, document understanding, and decision-making. However, integrating LLMs into long video understanding pipelines requires effective representations of visual content and strategies to handle noisy, redundant information. Existing datasets such as ActivityNet-QA, MovieQA, and EgoSchema reveal limitations, including biases and insufficient modeling of long-range dependencies, motivating the development of more robust, scalable solutions.
Core Problem
The core challenge in long video question-answering (LVQA) is to efficiently and accurately model extended temporal dependencies without resorting to overly complex or resource-intensive architectures. Traditional models rely on elaborate mechanisms like memory modules or graph-based structures, which are costly and difficult to train. Moreover, these models often struggle with noisy or incomplete visual data, leading to degraded performance. The key bottleneck is how to leverage powerful language models' reasoning abilities while effectively representing visual content. Addressing this requires a method that simplifies long-range modeling, filters irrelevant information, and maintains high accuracy in a zero-shot setting, making long video understanding feasible for real-world applications.
Innovation
This work introduces a two-stage, model-agnostic framework that combines short-term visual captioning with large model reasoning. The first innovation is using pretrained captioners (e.g., LaViLa, BLIP2) to generate textual summaries of short video clips, transforming visual data into language. The second innovation is a multi-round summarization prompt that guides large models to filter noise and focus on relevant content, significantly improving QA accuracy. Unlike prior methods relying on complex temporal modules, this approach leverages the reasoning power of foundation models, making the system simple, flexible, and scalable. The framework supports various captioners and large models, enabling easy adaptation and future improvements.
Methodology
- �� Segment long videos into short clips (e.g., 1s each).• Use pretrained visual captioners (LaViLa, BLIP2) to generate textual descriptions for each clip.• Concatenate these descriptions in temporal order, forming a comprehensive textual representation.• Design a multi-round prompt: first, ask the model to summarize the noisy captions; second, use this summary to answer specific questions.• Experiment with different captioning models, sampling strategies, and prompt designs to optimize performance.• Conduct ablation studies on component choices, clip length, and sampling frequency.• Evaluate on datasets like EgoSchema, NExT-QA, and IntentQA, focusing on zero-shot accuracy.
Experiments
The experiments involve evaluating the proposed framework on multiple datasets, including EgoSchema, NExT-QA, and IntentQA, using accuracy as the primary metric. The authors compare different visual captioners (LaViLa, BLIP2, EgoVLP) and large models (GPT-3.5, GPT-4), analyzing the impact of clip length, sampling rate, and prompt design. Ablation studies confirm the effectiveness of multi-round summarization prompts, with LaViLa and GPT-4 achieving the best results. The sampling strategy of 1s clips at 1Hz provides optimal balance between efficiency and accuracy. The system's robustness is validated across datasets, demonstrating its general applicability and zero-shot capabilities.
Results
LLoVi achieves 50.3% accuracy on EgoSchema, outperforming previous methods by 18.1%. LaViLa as captioner yields 55.2%, while GPT-4 reaches 61.2% accuracy. Short clips (1s) sampling outperforms longer segments, with only 2% accuracy drop at 8x efficiency. Multi-round summarization prompts improve accuracy by 3.6%, confirming their importance. The framework's flexibility allows effective adaptation across datasets, establishing a new baseline for zero-shot LVQA. These results highlight the potential of combining pretrained captioners with large models for scalable long video understanding.
Applications
This approach can be immediately applied to long video retrieval, automated content moderation, and assistive AI systems in surveillance and entertainment. Its zero-shot nature allows deployment without extensive retraining, suitable for real-world scenarios with diverse content. Long-term, it paves the way for multimodal, real-time video analysis in industries like security, media, and autonomous systems, enabling scalable, intelligent understanding of hours-long videos with minimal supervision.
Limitations & Outlook
The system's performance depends heavily on caption quality; noisy or incomplete captions impair reasoning. Sampling strategies may omit critical information in very long videos. Large models like GPT-4 are computationally expensive, limiting practical deployment. Future work should focus on improving caption robustness, reducing inference costs, and integrating multimodal cues to handle complex scenes more effectively.
Plain Language Accessible to non-experts
想象你在看一部很长的电影,要理解故事很难,因为信息太多。这个方法就像请一个聪明的朋友帮你做笔记,把每个重要场景用一句话总结出来,然后由一个超级聪明的人(大模型)帮你理解这些总结,回答你的问题。这个朋友会多次帮你总结,把杂乱的细节变成一段清楚的故事。最后,你问他问题,他会根据这些总结告诉你答案。这样,即使电影很长,也能很快知道发生了什么,就像用笔记和大脑合作,轻松搞定长故事。
ELI14 Explained like you're 14
想象你在看一部超级长的电影,要记住所有细节很难。这个方法就像请一个聪明的朋友帮你记笔记,把每个重要场景用一句话写下来,然后让一个超级聪明的大脑(大模型)帮你理解整个故事。这个朋友会多次帮你总结,把杂乱的细节变成一段清楚的故事。最后,你问他问题,他可以根据这些总结告诉你答案。这样,即使电影很长,也能很快知道发生了什么。这就像用笔记和大脑合作,轻松搞定长故事。
Abstract
We present LLoVi, a language-based framework for long-range video question-answering (LVQA). Unlike prior long-range video understanding methods, which are often costly and require specialized long-range video modeling design (e.g., memory queues, state-space layers, etc.), our approach uses a frame/clip-level visual captioner (e.g., BLIP2, LaViLa, LLaVA) coupled with a Large Language Model (GPT-3.5, GPT-4) leading to a simple yet surprisingly effective LVQA framework. Specifically, we decompose short and long-range modeling aspects of LVQA into two stages. First, we use a short-term visual captioner to generate textual descriptions of short video clips (0.5-8s in length) densely sampled from a long input video. Afterward, an LLM aggregates the densely extracted short-term captions to perform long-range temporal reasoning needed to understand the whole video and answer a question. To analyze what makes our simple framework so effective, we thoroughly evaluate various components of our system. Our empirical analysis reveals that the choice of the visual captioner and LLM is critical for good LVQA performance. Furthermore, we show that a specialized prompt that asks the LLM first to summarize the noisy short-term visual captions and then answer a given input question leads to a significant LVQA performance boost. On EgoSchema, which is best known as a very long-form video question-answering benchmark, our method achieves 50.3% accuracy, outperforming the previous best-performing approach by 18.1% (absolute gain). In addition, our approach outperforms the previous state-of-the-art by 4.1% and 3.1% on NeXT-QA and IntentQA. We also extend LLoVi to grounded LVQA and show that it outperforms all prior methods on the NeXT-GQA dataset. We will release our code at https://github.com/CeeZh/LLoVi.